packet:ninotnc
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
| packet:ninotnc [2025/12/18 22:06] – ei5iyb | packet:ninotnc [2026/02/07 12:44] (current) – m0lte | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 509: | Line 509: | ||
| {{: | {{: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== TXTAIL note ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Fun finding. Nino implemented TXTAIL support in April, to support a newer Icom with digital audio chain with latency. It seems that BPQ sends a TXTAIL KISS command with value 3 (30ms) by default. My 70cm 9k6 port has therefore had a 30ms tail since then. That's a ton of overhead at 9k6! TXTAIL=0 in the port config seems to result in BPQ still sending 3 (30ms) to the modem periodically. But TXTAIL=1 (ms) in the config seems to result in BPQ sending TAIL KISS command with value 0 (0ms) which is what we probably want. Therefore my recommendation is to put TXTAIL=1 into the PORT config for any NinoTNC port that isn't an Icom 9700. | ||
packet/ninotnc.txt · Last modified: by m0lte
