Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- packet:transceivers_144pk [2025/07/29 06:27] – g7taj
+++ packet:transceivers_144pk [2025/07/29 06:29] (current) – g7taj
@@ Line 89: / Line 89: @@
 Well, not quite. I wanted to test it on packet, after all, that’s what it was designed for! So I unplugged my Motorola GM350 from the NinoTNC and plugged in the 144PK with the lead that came with it (5 pin DIN to standard 9pin TNC connector, as used by Kantronics and the standard that the Nino also uses).
-“C MB7NSC” I wrote at the node prompt. The TX light lit and the H/H screeched and “Connected to MB7NSC” appeared. It connected and on 5watts, over 63kms. Wow, impressive. I did a few more test over the air, getting nodes lists, going to GB7IOW and posting on this wall there etc
+“C MB7NSC” I wrote at the node prompt. The TX light lit and the H/H screeched and “Connected to MB7NSC” appeared. It connected and on 5watts (the brick PSU it was connected to was limiting the output power), over 63kms. Wow, impressive. I did a few more test over the air, getting nodes lists, going to GB7IOW and posting on this wall there etc
 <code>(07-Jul 17:32) < G7TAJ > Testing using 144PK Wood&Douglas TcRX with modified frequencies</code>