uk-licence-archive
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| uk-licence-archive [2026/07/05 15:13] – [2006] g3aka | uk-licence-archive [2026/07/06 16:17] (current) – [2005] Added archive.org link to Amateur radio licensing - Policy Statement g3aka | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
| * Foundation and Intermediate were permitted to operate on vessels within UK and Crown Dependency Territorial Waters (12 mile limit) although licence wording still wasn't clear. Ofcom' | * Foundation and Intermediate were permitted to operate on vessels within UK and Crown Dependency Territorial Waters (12 mile limit) although licence wording still wasn't clear. Ofcom' | ||
| * Mandatory 15 minute Identification requirement scrapped, no longer have to ID every 15 minutes or when changing frequency. It became the responsibility of the licence holder to determine when to identify | * Mandatory 15 minute Identification requirement scrapped, no longer have to ID every 15 minutes or when changing frequency. It became the responsibility of the licence holder to determine when to identify | ||
| - | * Ofcom had wished to take advantage of this licence update to correct the error in the December 2006 licence that meant amateurs must use the Main Station callsign with Main Station RSL when visiting other regions within the UK&CD. Ofcom' | + | * Ofcom had wished to take advantage of this licence update to correct the error in the December 2006 licence that meant amateurs must use the Main Station callsign with Main Station RSL when visiting other regions within the UK&CD. Ofcom' |
| ===== 2007 ===== | ===== 2007 ===== | ||
| Line 92: | Line 92: | ||
| * Foundation were: | * Foundation were: | ||
| * Permitted to use 28 MHz band | * Permitted to use 28 MHz band | ||
| - | * No longer had to use CE approved transmitting equipment. Instead kit or ready-built transmitters just had to be operated in a way that satisfied IR-2028. The situation for Foundation kit built transmitters remained essentially the same, there had never been any compliancy requirements for kits neither had there been any definition on what comprised a kit, which allowed considerable flexibility. Transmitting equipment capable of operating in non-amateur bands was permitted as long as no transmissions were made out of authorised amateur bands | + | * No longer had to use CE approved transmitting equipment. Instead kit or ready-built transmitters just had to be operated in a way that satisfied IR-2028. The situation for Foundation kit built transmitters remained essentially the same, there had never been any compliancy requirements for kits neither had there been any definition on what comprised a kit, which allowed considerable flexibility |
| - | * Full were permitted to supervise an unlicenced person on-air. | + | * Full were permitted to supervise an unlicenced person on-air. |
| * The licence was free and lifetime, annual renewals were no longer required | * The licence was free and lifetime, annual renewals were no longer required | ||
| * This version of the lifetime licence didn't go as far as some amateurs wanted and still contained a number of unnecessary restrictions. This summary of the issues with the new licence was posted on the daily Southgate Amateur Radio News Service site on 5 July 2006: | * This version of the lifetime licence didn't go as far as some amateurs wanted and still contained a number of unnecessary restrictions. This summary of the issues with the new licence was posted on the daily Southgate Amateur Radio News Service site on 5 July 2006: | ||
| * {{ : | * {{ : | ||
| * Although planned to start from 1 October 2006 this version of the licence was never issued to anyone. Significant last-minute changes were made that addressed some of the issues raised in the Southgate post | * Although planned to start from 1 October 2006 this version of the licence was never issued to anyone. Significant last-minute changes were made that addressed some of the issues raised in the Southgate post | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== 2005 ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * On 26 May 2005 Ofcom published a //' | ||
| + | |||
| + | * From the outset the RSGB were opposed to the modernisation proposals and encouraged their members to respond to Ofcom consultation to voice their objections. The RSGB stated a Licence for Life was //" | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | |||
| + | * In addition to the consultation process, on 26 May 2005, MORI sent a questionnaire and accompanying material to 4,500 amateur radio licence holders. The survey sought licensees' | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | |||
| + | * The consultation document and the ~1,466 responses are available at [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | * The [[https:// | ||
| ===== 2004 ===== | ===== 2004 ===== | ||
uk-licence-archive.1783264387.txt.gz · Last modified: by g3aka
