member-projects:tait-cross-band-repeater
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| member-projects:tait-cross-band-repeater [2025/08/02 17:28] – m0lte | member-projects:tait-cross-band-repeater [2025/08/09 21:35] (current) – [Cable] m0lte | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
| 8 -------- 1 | 8 -------- 1 | ||
| 15 --- 9 | 15 --- 9 | ||
| + | |||
| + | In the official cable there is a board. Most of it can be ignored, however both the audio lines are connected to ground via 600 ohms, and have 4.7uF inline. During the event I did not have this cable, and I found I was transmitting distored audio - I suspect omitting the resistors and maybe the DC blocking capacitors was responsible for this. So I recommend adding at least the resistors. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Board- important bits highlighted. | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{: | ||
| ===== Settings ===== | ===== Settings ===== | ||
| Line 77: | Line 83: | ||
| There are a bunch of settings you can tweak to reduce the turnaround time, including: | There are a bunch of settings you can tweak to reduce the turnaround time, including: | ||
| - | - PTT debounce time (default 10ms) | + | * PTT debounce time (default 10ms) |
| - | - Lead-out delay | + | |
| + | * others... need to look up | ||
| + | ===== Antenna System ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | When you have two radios you need to provide either two antennas, one suitable antenna for each band, individually connected, or you can use a single dual band antenna to transmit and receive on simultaneously. | ||
| + | |||
| + | To do so, you need a device called a diplexer. (To confuse matters, Diamond, a common manufacturer of such devices, calls them duplexers.) | ||
| + | |||
| + | A suitable device for 2m and 70cm is the Diamond MX72. There are a few variants, each with different letter suffixes, these denote the connector types. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Safety ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | There is 60dB of isolation between the ports. Some simple maths reveals the strength of the transmitted signal on the receiving port, for example for 25W: | ||
| + | |||
| + | 25W = 44dBm | ||
| + | 44dBm (transmitted power level) - 60dB (isolation) = -16dBm | ||
| + | -16dBm = 0.0000251189W = 0.0251189 mW | ||
| + | |||
| + | Pretty low for a transmitted signal, but pretty high at a receiver input. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The risks are: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * densensitisation (receiver is temporarily deafened by a nearby transmitter) | ||
| + | * damage (receiver is permanently damaged by much higher signal voltage than the circuitry can withstand) | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Tait TM8100 specification manual states "no degradation after 5 minutes exposure to on-channel signals at + 27 dBm (2.2 V)" - we are 43dBm clear of this so we are a very long way from damaging the receiver. | ||
| + | |||
| + | However -16dBm is a pretty strong signal (-93dBm is considered 5/9 at VHF and above, so this is "77dB over 5/9") but the Tait filtering and receivers seem excellent and don't appear to be desensitised in practice. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== EMF Calculations ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Don't forget to do your EMF calcuations, | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Information: | ||
| + | * Calculator: https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Physical layout ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | I recommend rigidly attaching the two radios to each other and to a baseboard - this can be cheaply achieved using "all round band" - the 12mm stuff has perfect hole spacing for the Tait side threads. | ||
member-projects/tait-cross-band-repeater.1754155708.txt.gz · Last modified: by m0lte
